Search This Blog

Translate

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

“Chastening” in the book of Proverbs

Bible Study Outline on “Chastening” in the book of Proverbs.

 

TOPIC: CHASTENING

THEME: Comfort in Chastening for it is the will of God

OUTLINE

A.  Sources of Chastening

1.    Chastening is of the LORD (3:11a)

2.    Chastening is a correction from the LORD (3:11b-12a)

3.    Chastening comes from someone who loves and cares (13: 24; 19:18)

 

B.   Reason of Chastening

1.    Chastening is because of love (3:12; 13:24)

2.    Chastening is because of hope (19:18)

 

C.   Purpose of Chastening

1.    Chastening drives away foolishness (22:15)

2.    Chastening brings forth wisdom (29:15)

3.    Chastening will bring rest and delight to the soul (29:17)

 

D.  Attitude towards Chastening

1.    Stupid person hates chastening (12:1; 9:8)

2.    Sensible person receives chastening (15:5; 9:8)

Prepared on 07 July 2014

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Interpreting Revelation by Merrill Tenney: A Reading Summary

 


        Merrill Tenney’s Interpreting Revelation provides an in-depth analysis of the Book of Revelation, offering various interpretative frameworks for understanding its complex themes, structure, and theological significance. Tenney approaches the text with an emphasis on Christology, eschatology, and symbolism, advocating for a futurist perspective while also discussing the historical context and literary genre of the book. This summary synthesizes the main arguments presented across the chapters of Tenney's work, with particular attention to the structure, interpretive methods, and theological implications he proposes.

Chapter 1: Background of Revelation

        In the opening chapter, Tenney establishes the foundational background of Revelation, identifying its unique literary features, particularly its use of symbolism (p.6). He affirms the traditional view of John the Apostle as the author, grounding this argument in the historical context and the known opposition of Roman political power at the time (p.14). Tenney argues that the book's purpose was to engage early Christian communities in the spiritual conflict with imperial Rome, highlighting both the persecution of believers and the broader societal challenges (pp.14–15). He emphasizes that the genre of Revelation is distinctly apocalyptic, a literary form used to convey new, divinely revealed truths during times of crisis (p.17).

Chapter 2: The Theme of Revelation

        The second chapter focuses on the primary themes of Revelation. Tenney articulates the central message of the book as a revelation of Jesus Christ, who functions as judge, redeemer, and king (p.22). According to Tenney, Revelation is not only concerned with future events but also addresses the redemption of believers and the ultimate establishment of God’s kingdom (pp.20–21). The book’s apocalyptic nature allows for the unveiling of divine truths, particularly concerning the end times, which are inherently tied to Christ’s authority and kingship.

Chapter 3: Structure of Revelation

        In Chapter 3, Tenney acknowledges the difficulty of establishing a universally accepted structure for Revelation, but he advocates for a literary approach (p.22). He points to repeated phrases such as “and I saw” and “in the Spirit” as structural markers throughout the book. He proposes a comprehensive outline that divides the text into five sections:

1.    Prologue: Christ Communicating (1:1–8)

2.    Vision I: Christ in the Church (1:9–3:22)

3.    Vision II: Christ in the Cosmos (4:1–16:21)

4.    Vision III: Christ in Conquest (17:1–21:8)

5.    Vision IV: Christ in Consummation (21:9–22:5)

6.    Epilogue: Christ Challenging (22:6–21) (p.23)

        He critiques alternative structural proposals, notably those emphasizing numerical or chronological frameworks, finding them less persuasive and more problematic than his own approach. Tenney’s analysis of recurring motifs such as churches, seals, trumpets, and bowls highlights the book’s thematic unity, making his structure both compelling and explanatory.

Chapter 4: Introduction to Revelation (1:1–8)

        Chapters 4 through 9 function as commentary on the book of Revelation. Chapter 4 presents Revelation 1:1–8 as an introduction, with a focus on its theological implications. Tenney explores the plenary genitive construction in the phrase “of Jesus Christ” (p.31), favoring the subjective genitive interpretation to emphasize that Revelation originates from Christ Himself. He argues that Revelation serves as a divine response to believers’ doubts and fears, offering a “pictorial promise of victory” amid persecution (p.32).

Chapter 5: Vision I – The Seven Churches of Asia (1:9–3:22)

        Chapter 5 focuses on the letters to the seven churches, which Tenney organizes around seven key aspects of each church's relationship with Christ:

1.    The Commission

2.    The Character

3.    The Commendation

4.    The Condemnation

5.    The Correction

6.    The Call

7.    The Challenge (pp.37–38)

        Tenney insightfully shows how Christ’s character is tied to each church’s particular challenges (p.53). He also provides historical context for each church, such as the persecution faced by the church in Smyrna (p.44).

Chapter 6: Vision II – The Process of World Judgments (4:1–16:21)

        In Chapter 6, Tenney addresses the judgment sequences in Revelation, focusing on the seven seals, trumpets, and bowls. He suggests that the bowls of wrath are more intense than the trumpets, although both represent escalating divine judgments (p.61). He posits that these judgments may reflect “three differing but partially synchronous periods” within God's redemptive plan (p.62), though he ultimately favors a successive view of the judgments.

Chapter 7: Vision III – The Climax of Judgment (17:1–21:8)

        Chapter 7 explores the destruction of Babylon, interpreting it as a symbol of evil and corruption rather than a single geographical location. Tenney critiques readings that equate Babylon solely with Rome, proposing instead that it represents various forms of immorality throughout history (p.63). He notes that the final manifestation of Babylon is yet to come (p.65), and he emphasizes the universal scope of Revelation, where Christ’s final victory brings the defeat of evil (pp.62, 68).

Chapter 8: Vision IV – The Eternal City (21:9–22:5)

        In Chapter 8, Tenney analyzes the New Jerusalem, interpreting it literally and also as a symbol of God’s ultimate reign and the fulfillment of His promises (p.69). His examination of the seven negative statements about the city helps clarify its unique spiritual significance (p.70).

Chapter 9: Epilogue (22:6–21)

        Chapter 9 examines the epilogue of Revelation. Tenney argues that this section stands apart from the preceding visions due to its distinct content, structure, and repetition (p.73). It serves to encourage believers to remain faithful as they await Christ’s imminent return.

Chapter 10: Observation and Conclusion of Revelation

        In Chapter 10, Tenney presents his final reflections on the structure and thematic unity of Revelation. He asserts that the book’s literary structure is unified by the theme of the Holy Spirit, whose presence weaves through the visions and speeches of the book (p. 75). This spiritual unity reflects the overarching themes of divine sovereignty and redemptive purpose, providing coherence to the book’s diverse and often fragmented visions. In addition to the unity of the Spirit, Tenney identifies the unity of the person, sovereignty, redemptive purpose, and expectation as key unifying elements throughout the structure of Revelation.

Chapter 11: Old Testament Background of Revelation

        Chapter 11 delves into the extensive Old Testament allusions found in Revelation, noting that the book draws upon a rich tapestry of images, themes, and terminology rooted in earlier Jewish scriptures. Tenney meticulously catalogs 348 allusions (95 of which are repetitions, resulting in approximately 250 unique allusions), identified either by verbal resemblance or contextual connection. These connections emphasize the continuity between the Old and New Testaments. He also clarifies the distinctions between quotations, citations, and allusions, providing a valuable tool for expositors (pp. 77–80). Tenney notes that 37 Old Testament chapters are referenced more than once (p. 87). He highlights the significance of motifs such as the Book of Life, which represents God’s eternal purposes and salvation amid persecution (p. 83), and the image of lightning as a manifestation of God's holiness, reinforcing His judgment against a rebellious world (p. 83). Overall, the Old Testament context enriches the understanding of Revelation, allowing readers to appreciate its biblical intertextuality and theological depth.

Chapter 12: Christology of Revelation

        In Chapter 12, Tenney explores the Christological themes of Revelation. He examines key titles and descriptions of Jesus Christ, such as “the faithful witness” (referring to His earthly ministry) and “the firstborn of the dead” (emphasizing His victory over death and preeminence in resurrection) (p. 91). The Christology in Revelation highlights not only Christ's past work but also His future role as sovereign Judge and eternal King. For Christians, “the future is not measured in terms of what, but in terms of whom” (p. 93). Tenney asserts that Revelation offers a comprehensive view of Christ’s nature, focusing on His infallible discernment, final authority, and imminent return. He also explores the different uses of the term "Lord" in the Eastern and Western Roman Empires, linking it to Christ’s sovereign and victorious nature over worldly powers (p. 103). For Tenney, Christ’s return is imminent and significant not only for the universal church but also for individuals and humanity at large (p. 105).

Chapter 13: The Chronological Approach

        Chapter 13 examines various interpretative schools regarding the structure of Revelation, with a particular focus on the chronological approach. Tenney critiques the Preterist view—which argues that most of Revelation was fulfilled in the first century—as inadequate for explaining the full scope of the book’s predictions (p. 107). He also challenges the Historicist view, which attempts to align Revelation’s events with Roman and Western historical developments, arguing that it neglects significant global contexts such as India and China (p. 109). Tenney observes that this view often mirrors the Futurist approach in its literal interpretation (p. 111). Ultimately, he supports the Futurist view, contending that it best aligns with the literal fulfillment of the events described in Revelation, particularly the unfulfilled judgments awaiting future generations (p. 115).

Chapter 14: The Eschatological Method

        In this chapter, Tenney discusses the eschatological framework through which Revelation is interpreted. He traces the development of the postmillennial view, particularly in Augustine's City of God (p. 116). Tenney critiques postmillennialism for failing to account for the imminence of Christ’s return, a theme emphasized in Revelation (p. 118). He underscores the troubling reality that more sinners are born each day than souls saved (p. 119). According to Tenney, Amillennialists are those dissatisfied with the postmillennial view (p. 119); they reject the optimistic “evolutionary goal” of postmillennialism and instead believe in Christ’s imminent return (p. 122). Tenney affirms the Premillennial view, which holds that Christ will physically return to establish a literal millennial kingdom. He supports this stance through an analysis of early Christian writings, including Justin Martyr, who identified himself as a “right-minded Christian” for believing in the millennium (p. 124). Tenney’s critique of the postmillennial and amillennial views reflects his conviction that Premillennialism best aligns with Revelation’s structure and overall message.

Chapter 15: The Terminology of Revelation

        In Chapter 15, Tenney explores the terminology of Revelation, focusing on its symbolic language and specific phrases of theological importance. He categorizes this terminology into three main groups: institutions/objects, personalities/places, and formulae (p. 133). For instance, while the beatitudes in Revelation convey blessings, they are not intended to serve as a structural key to the book (p. 144). Similarly, the songs found throughout the book are scattered and not confined to a singular structure (p. 145). Tenney’s analysis demonstrates how the book’s terminology contributes to the theological narrative of Christ’s victory and the establishment of His eternal reign.

Chapter 16: The Symbolism of Revelation

        Chapter 16 is dedicated to the symbolism of Revelation. Tenney deeply engages with the symbolic nature of apocalyptic literature, arguing that Revelation’s symbols communicate figurative truths rather than literal definitions. He emphasizes that symbols function as a means of conveying truth through imagery rather than direct statements (p. 149). Tenney classifies these symbols into three types: those explicitly explained within the text, those derived from Old Testament backgrounds, and those associated with apocalyptic literature or pagan imagery (p. 149). One example is the white stone, for which Tenney notes the lack of an Old Testament precedent and stresses the importance of understanding the historical and cultural context of the first-century audience (p. 152). Additionally, he interprets the lake of fire through the lens of heathen mythology, suggesting its meaning would have been readily understood by the original readers (p. 154).

Chapter 17: The Meaning of Revelation in the Present Age

        The final chapter of Tenney’s work addresses the relevance of Revelation for contemporary believers. He proposes four ways in which the book remains meaningful:

1.    A Divine Estimate of History

2.    A Prediction of the Future

3.    A Contribution to Christian Thought

4.    A Spiritual Stimulus for Daily Living (p. 156)

        Tenney argues that Revelation helps believers understand that this world is not permanent and that the future will be governed by God’s eternal kingdom (p. 157). Ultimately, he affirms that the book is not only about predicting future events but about stabilizing the life and witness of Christians as they navigate a chaotic world (p. 158).

My Final Reflection:

        In summary (of the reading summary), Merrill Tenney’s Interpreting Revelation offers a detailed and systematic approach to understanding the book of Revelation, with an emphasis on its Christological, eschatological, and symbolic themes. Tenney’s futurist interpretation remains central to his analysis, yet he engages critically with alternative perspectives. His thorough examination of the Old Testament background, Christological titles, and symbolic language provides readers with a comprehensive framework for appreciating the theological significance of Revelation. Tenney’s work continues to be a valuable resource for scholars and students interested in the apocalyptic genre and its enduring relevance to contemporary Christian theology.

        I found this book to be the most helpful among all the works I have read on the interpretation of Revelation. The structure offered by the author, along with the thematic unity woven throughout, is impressive. While I found some areas less significant, I still learned something from every chapter. I only wish he had written more!

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

Loyalty

 It is the road of denial;

There shall be no glory, victory, or vindication.

It is the road of failure;

It may win no soul, nor change anyone.

It is the road of suffering;

Abuses and shame line the sides of the road.

It is the road of the Lord;

Dare not expect any other way but to march on.



Tuesday, April 08, 2025

Mercy Is Not Fair—It’s Better: Musing on Romans 9:14–18

Studying Romans 9:1418 [ESV 2011]

Rom 9:14 What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God's part? By no means!

Rom 9:15 For He says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.”

Rom 9:16 So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.

Rom 9:17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that My name might be proclaimed in all the earth.”

Rom 9:18 So then He has mercy on whomever He wills, and He hardens whomever He wills.


The Seeming Problem: God seems partial. God seems tyrannical. God seems unjust.

The Difficult Statement Apart from v.14: “He hardens whomever He wills” (v. 18), and “desiring to… prepare for destruction” (v. 22).

The Theological Message from the Context:

1.    God’s Mercy: The word "mercy" is found 11 times in Romans, 5 of which are in this passage, vv. 15–23. The mercy of God refers to His forgiveness or overlooking of sins when we (offenders, transgressors, sinners) never deserve it. As sinners, we would rather have God be merciful than fair. The justice (fairness) of God would condemn us forever without forgiveness (provided in Christ).

2.    God’s Absolute Sovereignty: God’s will is mentioned at least 5 times in vv. 14-18. Paul preceded this truth by discussing the immeasurable love of God. The sovereignty of God refers to His benevolent control over everything, such that nothing happens outside His good purpose. Thus, the meaning of God’s sovereignty excludes the understanding that God is malevolent, capricious, or megalomaniacal.

Going Deeper:

1. The Hardening of Pharaoh: The hardening of Pharaoh is first done by himself:

·       1st plague – Ex. 7:22

·       2nd plague – Ex. 8:15

·       3rd plague – Ex. 8:19

·       4th plague – Ex. 8:32

·       5th plague – Ex. 9:7

Only from the 6th plague onward is it explicitly stated that “the LORD hardened” (Ex. 9:12).

·       8th plague – Ex. 10:20

·       9th plague – Ex. 10:27

·       10th plague – Ex. 11:10

·       End of Pharaoh – Ex. 14:8

The hardening of Pharaoh is primarily his own doing (from every human perspective, there is nothing to blame God for).

2. The Redefinition of Goodness, Love, and Mercy: Goodness, love, and mercy are aspects of God’s nature. Since we are fallen, we deceive ourselves into thinking of them differently. We have redefined these virtues because our hearts are depraved (Jer. 17:9). Depravity refers to the human condition where sin has corrupted every part of man, rendering us incapable of pleasing God on our own, and even our best and most righteous deeds are filthy before God’s standard. Paul established this in Romans 1-3. Paul is now speaking about the sheer mercy of God, demonstrated to people. The first incident of sin in Eden involved the redefinition of goodness—the forbidden fruit was described as “good for food” (Gen 3:6), and the deception of the couple. In this context, depraved humans tend to view the justice of God as unfair and the prerogative of God’s mercy as deserved by sinners.

The Validity of the Question (v. 14): The question here is rhetorical, meant to lead the reader toward a convincing and impressive point in the opposite direction. The fact that Paul asks this question makes it a sensible inquiry. However, Paul will not entertain or validate any ignorant or arrogant person (vv. 20–21) who seeks self-justification or excuses. Paul’s question intends to portray the wisdom of God so that we might believe in His mercy more and more. Paul’s quotation of Ex. 33:19 is in the context of mercy to reinforce the truth that God is merciful even in His justice. This question arises from a presupposed knowledge of God’s character, so it is valid when we approach it with a seeking heart, not a self-justifying one (finding fault with God).

The Meaning of the Passage: Election[1] (vv. 4, 8, 11, 26, 30) is a sovereign work of God. It is based on nothing else. It is His will. He does it according to His infinite mercy. God’s election does not cast any doubt on His impartiality. God is just in condemning sinners. Election is a demonstration of grace[2] and mercy. This mercy of God is effective and will not fail. Election accomplishes God’s will and purpose. This doctrine should help us trust God more, knowing that His judgment for unbelievers and salvation for believers are both certain.

A Few Implications:

Negatively, from v. 17, the Illustration of Pharaoh: The foolishness of contending against God. O fools, God laughs at you – Ps. 59:8; 37:13. You thought you triumphed, but you are judged. You thought you were wise, but you are a fool (Rom. 1:22).

Negatively, What We Need to Know: The default destiny of man. The fallenness of man. The creatureliness of man (the depravity of man – v. 16). If we understand these truths, we might never see the seeming problem. Rather, we will beg to be part of the group who obtain mercy, because the question of justice or injustice evaporates when we recognize our fallen state before God and our need for His mercy.



[1] Election is the theological term for the action of God in which certain individuals or groups of people are chosen by God for a special purpose and destiny before the creation of the world. In other words, God chose some people for salvation before they were even born or created. In Calvinistic understanding, everyone, and only the elect of God, will be saved

[2] Grace is best understood (and simplified) as God’s unearned/unmerited favor granted to a person who does not deserve it. We may understand God’s mercy as God not punishing us for what we deserve, and God’s grace as God blessing us with what we do not deserve.

Tuesday, April 01, 2025

The Gospel Outline

            A few years ago, I was asked to present the Gospel in five minutes. As I began to write an outline for it, I realized it had become too exhaustive for a five-minute presentation. However, I continued working on it so that I could use it for a sermon someday.

The Gospel Outline

1.     God Created Man with Purpose (Everything has a purpose; failure leads to a dustbin[1])

a.     Creation, Image (Gen 1:27), Purpose – to glorify Him (Isaiah 43:7, Rom 1:21), for good (Gen 1:31), to enjoy God’s presence (Gen 1 and 3).

b.    Man’s withness (illust. of lovers, the elderly; also Gen 2:18). Illust. of Markers and Trashes (Rom 3:12).

2.     Man Rebels Against God (God meant everything for good, but (bad news) man chooses to rebel)

a.     Not worshiping, not giving glory, not withness (glory – Rom 1:21, Rom 3:12). Not reproducing good (though to be fruitful and made in God's image).

b.    Cosmic treason (God’s standard, man’s filthy rags), universal – Rom 3:10; infancy – Ps 51:5; personal – failing to do and not doing (Rom 1:21, Heb 9:27, Rom 14:12).

3.     Verdict: Hell

a.     The seriousness of sin (God’s standard) (Deut. 29:20; 32:22), Man’s fallenness (Illust. of 30% pass mark, good can’t outweigh bad, sin for sin) (Isaiah 64:6; Romans 3:23; Exo. 20:5; Ezekiel 18:20; Rom 6:23; Rom 2:16).

b.    The reality of Hell (absence of God’s favor; exile) (Ps 9:17; Isaiah 14:9; Matt 23:33), eternality – justice, fire, and punishment (inexpressible agony, pains, suffering, and sorrow) (Mark 9:45, 48).

4.     Way of Escape

a.     The desperate condition of man (Eph 2:1, Rom 5:10, Rom 8:8, Eccl 8:11, John 8:21).

b.    Only Jesus as Savior (John 14:6; Acts 4:12).

5.     Justice and Love Demonstrated in Jesus

a.     Man must die (sin for sin – justice) (Gen 2:17; Gen 3:15, 3:21; Rom 6:23; Heb 9:22; Lev 17:11).

b.    The God-Man, Jesus, must die (sin is against God; sin is exhausted in Christ; resurrection). because only He, being both God and man, can fully satisfy the penalty for sin (love-relatedness) (John 3:16-18; Gal 3:13; Heb 10:8-10; 1 John 4:10; Mark 2:7).

6.     Trusting in Jesus

a.     For believers only, and willful damnation for those who reject (John 3:16-18; Eph 2:8-9; John 8:24).

b.    Trusting in and as the only solution (John 14:6; Acts 4:12).

c.     Growing in knowledge of Him (through the Bible, church, of His life and teachings) (John 15:6; Col 3:16; 1 John 2:19).

d.    Repentance and following, (Luke 13:3; 2 Pet 3:9, Acts 8:22; 26:20; 17:30; Luke 5:32).

Conclusion: Isaiah 55:6-7; 2 Cor 6:2; Rom 10:9-10



[1] A marker pen is made to write; when it does not function anymore, we throw it in a dustbin. Similarly, when we are not fulfilling our purpose to glorify God in God’s way, God has the right to throw us in the trash bin to be burned up.